Your feedback
See the CASPer report you get after each sitting
Every sitting returns a quartile estimate and a section-by-section breakdown showing exactly where points slipped.
CASPer exam report
Each sitting is graded the way raters read your reasoning, then mapped to a quartile band with named fixes.
- Quartile estimate 3rd
- Consistent reasoning, thin on stakeholder naming.
- Ethical reasoning 78/100
- Both sides considered; commit to a decision sooner.
- Professionalism 84/100
- Tone stayed appropriate under the conflict prompt.
- Communication 69/100
- Two answers ran out of time before the conclusion.
Name the stakeholders in the first sentence and your reasoning score climbs without writing more. Time management is the single biggest gap in this sitting.
Sit a full CASPer before the real one
The clock is what breaks most applicants. Run full-length timed sittings, drill the scenario bank between them, and get section-by-section scoring with a quartile estimate.